--oo00oo--MANUAL 900-1
SECTION 02.6
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT
--oo00oo--
BUREAU OF MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS AND PROJECTS
September 2006 900-1-02.6 1 of 30
This procedure is used to assist the New York State Canal Corporation (Corporation) with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) process and identify whether the Corporation’s actions will impact the environment in a manner that would require mitigation or whether the action would require further evaluation as required by an Environmental Impact Statement.
In addition, the Corporation’s real property transactions may require floodplain management and/or other permits. This procedure provides a process for conducting SEQRA reviews and a checklist to assist the Corporation in identifying all necessary permits for land transactions.
New York State Environmental Conservation Law §§8-0101 to 8-0117 6 NYCRR Part 617 (SEQRA Regulations) 6 NYCRR Part 502 (Floodplain Management) New York State Finance Law §139-j, §139-k Executive Instruction entitled Inappropriate Lobbying Influence In Authority/Corporation
Procurements Canal Real Property Management Policy (25-6-01C)
The Corporation is responsible for the maintenance, operation, construction, reconstruction, improvement, development, financing and promotion of the Canal System and for implementation of the New York State Canal Recreationway Plan (CRP). As such, the Corporation must determine the environmental significance of its actions related to real property transactions.
September 2006 900-1-02.6
This general procedure is to ensure that the Corporation will identify all known and potential environmental impacts associated with a real property transaction. In addition, this procedure assists the Corporation in identifying other permits which may be needed for proposed land transactions.
4.2.1. Pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 502, Floodplain Management Criteria for State Projects, the Corporation must ensure that the use of property under the jurisdiction of the Corporation and the siting, construction, administration and disposition of property under the jurisdiction of the Corporation and State-financed facilities are conducted in ways that will minimize flood hazards and losses. The Division Canal Engineer, in consultation with the Office of Transportation Planning and Environmental Services (OTPES), will complete the FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR STATE PROJECTS (NYCRR PART 502)1 for projects that fall within a floodplain to ensure compliance with 6 NYCRR Part 502. The completed document will be filed in the Project Record.
4.2.2. The applicant is responsible for identifying, applying for and receiving any other local, State or federally required permits for any proposed use and/or work associated with the real property transaction. The Corporation can use ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS POTENTIALLY APPLICABLE TO PROJECTS ON CANAL CORPORATION LAND2 as guidance to determine which permits may be required by the applicant. This form is for internal use only and will not be distributed externally or used to advise the applicant of any potential permitting requirements. The applicant retains the responsibility for identifying required permits and for obtaining them. The applicant must supply the Corporation with copies of required permits prior to start of any work on property under the jurisdiction of the Corporation.
4.2.3. If federal approval or funding is required, a review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is also required.
1 Exhibit 1 2 Exhibit 2 September 2006 900-1-02.6
4.3.1. SEQRA requires environmental review at an early stage of the land transaction process. SEQRA requires a “lead agency” to properly define – or scope – the action under consideration before attempting to determine the environmental significance of the action. This requirement seeks to avoid segmenting the environmental review. Usually, all phases of a project must be considered at one time. For example, if an applicant wants to lease land to initially place two or three docks, but may ultimately develop the site into a marina, the scope of review should include the marina. Typically, the Corporation will be the lead agency for projects on land under the jurisdiction of the Corporation. However, in some cases, where it is to the Corporation’s benefit and is made with Corporation concurrence, a decision for a municipality or another State agency to assume SEQRA project lead may occur. Any finding of the municipality or State agency must be consistent with Canal rules, regulations, and policies. On non-Canal lead projects, the Corporation, as the landowner and an involved agency, may supplement a municipal determination by preparing a findings statement that would provide additional requirements pursuant to the Corporation’s approval processes.
4.3.2. SEQRA and environmental permitting requirements are complex and based on statutes, regulations, State agency guidance documents and court decisions. The Legal Department has an important role within this procedure and should be contacted if there are any questions, or if assistance or guidance is required during the SEQRA review.
1 Exhibit 3 2 Exhibit 4 September 2006 900-1-02.6
• Unlisted actions are those which are not Type I or II.
In addition, the Corporation completed a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for the Canal Recreationway Plan (CRP). Actions that were reviewed as part of the CRP need no further environmental review. They are described in Section 4.4.6.2. However, note that if the action to be taken has changed from the action in the CRP or has increased in scope, additional environmental review is necessary.
4.4.2. The applicant will submit an application form and provide information to the Corporation to initiate the land transaction process.
4.4.3. The Division Permit Engineer (DPE) will review the CANAL INQUIRY (TA-N99114) and determine, with the advice of the Division Environmental Specialist and/or Headquarters’ OTPES, whether a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) or Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) is required, and will forward the appropriate form to the applicant with the application package.
4.4.3.1. At a minimum, a SEAF must be prepared by the applicant. Part 1 is completed by the applicant and Part 2 is completed by the lead agency . A SEAF can be used for environmental assessment of an unlisted action and can fully satisfy the lead agency’s requirements under SEQRA. However, agencies are free to prepare (or cause to prepare) a FEAF where circumstances warrant obtaining additional information.
4.4.3.2. The preparation of a FEAF is mandatory for all Type I actions. The FEAF consists of three major parts. Part 1 is completed by the applicant. Part 2 contains questions that establish the magnitude of the proposed project’s environmental impacts. Part 3 is to be completed if one or more potentially significant environmental impacts have been identified in Part 2. Part 2 and Part 3, if applicable, are completed by the lead agency.
4.4.4. The applicant will complete Part 1 of the SEAF or FEAF and return the form with the completed application package.
September 2006 900-1-02.6
4.4.5. Upon submittal of the complete application package, including the SEAF or FEAF, the Division Canal Engineer (DCE), DPE, Division Environmental Specialist and/or OTPES as appropriate will review the application and determine if the application should be progressed based on known and/or potential environmental impacts associated with the project.
4.4.6. If the application is progressed, the DCE, in consultation with the DPE and the Division Environmental Specialist and/or OTPES, will review the SEAF or FEAF and determine whether the action is exempt from environmental review under SEQRA or whether this activity was considered under the GEIS for the CRP.
4.4.6.1. Type II actions are not subject to further environmental review under SEQRA. OTPES and/or the Legal Department should be contacted if there are any questions whether an action is Type II or not.
4.4.6.2. The GEIS completed for the CRP provides an evaluation for already established uses of the Canal System. Since these uses have already been evaluated under SEQRA, no further review is required for the following actions if the scope of the action is the same as the action now proposed:
September 2006 900-1-02.6
4.4.7. If the action does not require further review (e.g., Type II action or under the GEIS), then the DCE need not complete Part 2 or Part 3 of SEAF or FEAF. The DCE will complete DOCUMENTATION OF PROJECTS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE FURTHER SEQRA REVIEW+, to document that no further review is necessary, and put this form in the Project Record.
4.4.8. If the action is subject to further SEQRA review, the DCE, in consultation with the DPE and Division Environmental Specialist and/or OTPES, will determine whether the action is a SEQRA Type I action or Unlisted Action in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.4.
4.4.9. For Type I and unlisted actions inconsistent with use of a SEAF or if the applicant has not submitted a FEAF, the DCE will provide the applicant with a FEAF and instruct the applicant to prepare Part 1 of the document. Review cannot continue until applicant returns the FEAF.
4.5. Determining Other Agency Involvement and Review
4.5.1. The DCE, in consultation with the DPE and Division Environmental Specialist and/or OTPES, will determine whether the action includes other “involved” and/or “interested agencies” that will need to review the SEQRA documentation for the land transaction.
4.5.2. If the application is for a Type I action and there are other involved agencies, the DCE, in consultation with OTPES, will initiate lead agency coordination with the other involved agencies pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.6. The Legal Department should be contacted to assist if needed.
+ Exhibit 5
September 2006 900-1-02.6
4.5.3. If the application is for an unlisted action and there are other involved agencies, the DCE, in consultation with the Corporation’s Office of Land Management (OLM) and OTPES, will decide whether to pursue a coordinated or uncoordinated review with the other involved agencies, after determining whether a coordinated SEQRA review would better protect the interest of the Corporation. In a coordinated review, one agency is chosen to be the lead agency. In an uncoordinated review, each agency would act independently and make its own findings. The Legal Department should be contacted to assist if needed.
4.5.4. When the Corporation is not the lead agency, a permit, lease, sale or easement may not be issued until a Type II determination, a negative declaration or a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been received and reviewed by the Corporation and the ultimate decision has been made for the transaction. In the case of a FEIS, the Corporation must also issue a Findings Statement.
If the action is either a Type I or unlisted action and is in the coastal area, the provisions of 19 NYCRR Part 600 apply. This provision applies whether the Corporation is the lead agency or an involved agency. The following areas are designated as coastal zones:
4.7.1. If the Corporation is the designated lead agency under SEQRA, the DCE, in consultation with the DPE and Division Environmental Specialist and/or OTPES, will draft Part 2 of the SEAF or FEAF and, if necessary, a visual EAF addendum.
September 2006 900-1-02.6
4.7.2. The DCE will make a draft recommendation regarding the environmental significance of the proposed action. Part 2 of the SEAF or FEAF and DETERMINING ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE UNDER SEQRA (6 NYCRR §617.7)+ shall be used to determine the environmental significance. If needed, OTPES and/or the Legal Department should be contacted to assist.
4.7.3. The DCE will forward the SEQRA documents and recommendations to the OTPES,. The DCE will notify OLM that the SEQRA documents and recommendation have been forwarded to Headquarters.
4.7.4. The OTPES will review the application, the SEAF or FEAF and any recommendations from DCE and make a final recommendation of environmental significance to the Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer has been delegated the authority by the Canal Board to review and make SEQRA determinations on behalf of the Corporation for land transactions under the contracts program. For other land transactions, the Canal Board will review, make SEQRA determinations, and once a SEQRA determination is made, delegate as appropriate the final sign-off of the determination.
4.7.5. If the Corporation issues a positive declaration (i.e., there is the potential for a significant environmental impact), a permit, lease, sale or easement may not be issued until there is further environmental study and review. The Chief Engineer will notify OTPES, and OLM. In consultation with OLM, OTPES will contact the Legal Department as necessary for further SEQRA process advice. OLM will also notify the Division Canal Engineer of the determination.
4.7.5.1. OLM will notify the applicant of the positive declaration and the applicant will be required to obtain all necessary information needed to develop a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
4.7.5.2. OLM will coordinate review with the Legal Department who has review and oversight responsibility for the SEQRA process following the submittal of the DEIS.
4.7.5.3. The lead agency will ensure that copies of the DEIS are forwarded to other involved or interested agencies.
+ Exhibit 6 September 2006 900-1-02.6
4.7.6. If the Corporation issues a negative declaration (i.e., there will be no significant environmental impact), the Chief Engineer or his designee will notify OLM.
4.7.6.1. The lead agency will send a copy of the negative declaration to other involved agencies and interested agencies, the DCE, applicant and the Legal Department.
4.7.7. It is important to note that at any time prior to its decision, the Corporation may have its negative declaration superseded by a positive declaration by any other involved agency. If this happens, no permits, leases, sales or easements can be granted until the involved agency requirements are satisfied.
4.7.8. The Corporation, as lead agency, may issue a conditioned negative declaration as part of its determination of environmental significance for an unlisted action only. The applicant must have completed a FEAF, coordinated review must have been completed, and the lead agency must find that all identified significant environmental impacts can be mitigated by conditions imposed upon the applicant. A 30-day public comment period must also be provided. This eliminates the need to prepare an EIS. The Chief Engineer or his designee must confer with the Legal Department to ensure that all SEQRA requirements have been met.
5. Complying with §139-j and §139-k of the State Finance Law (Lobbying Law)
Any contact (inquiry, etc.) made regarding a real property transaction following the TRANSACTION ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION (TAR) form approval for negotiated sales and subsequent to the first notice of a competitive process for disposal of such real property (solicitation, RFP, etc.) is subject to the Lobbying Law and must be recorded. See the Executive Instruction entitled INAPPROPRIATE LOBBYING INFLUENCE IN AUTHORITY/CORPORATION PROCUREMENTS.
September 2006 900-1-02.6
6. Responsibilities
The DCE will coordinate a review of the application, including SEQRA documents, review the SEQRA SEAF/FEAF and determine whether the action is exempt from environmental review. For exempt actions, the DCE will complete Exhibit 5 and ensure the form is retained in the file. The DCE will determine whether there are other involved and/or interested agencies, complete Part 2 and/or Part 3 (if applicable) of the SEAF/FEAF and provide a recommendation as to potential environmental impacts to Headquarters.
The Division Environmental Specialist will work with the DCE on the initial SEQRA review.
The DPE will review the CANAL INQUIRY determine whether the applicant should file a SEAF or FEAF and provide the applicant with the appropriate form. The DPE will work with the DCE on the initial SEQRA review.
OTPES will receive SEQRA documents and Division recommendations and work with OLM and the DPE to coordinate the SEQRA review at Headquarters level and provide recommendations to the Chief Engineer.
OLM will oversee the SEQRA process when a positive declaration has been issued and an environmental impact statement and review are required.
The Legal Department will assist with any SEQRA procedural questions and assist with the SEQRA process as needed.
7. Definitions Actions include:
1. Projects or physical activities, such as construction or other activities that may affect the environment by changing the use, appearance or condition of any natural resource or structure, that:
(iii) require one or more new or modified approvals from an agency or agencies; September 2006 900-1-02.6
Coordinated Review is a process that establishes a lead agency when more than one agency is involved in the review to ensure the satisfactory completion of the SEQRA process. A coordinated review is required for Type I actions and is optional for unlisted actions.
Involved Agency is any agency that has jurisdiction by law to fund, approve or directly undertake an action.
Interested Agency is any agency that lacks the jurisdiction to fund, approve or directly undertake an action, but wishes to participate in the review process because of its specific expertise or concern about a proposed action.
Mitigation is a way or method to avoid or minimize adverse environmental impacts.
Negative Declaration is a written determination by a lead agency that the implementation of the action as proposed will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Positive Declaration is a written statement prepared by the lead agency indicating that implementation of the action as proposed may have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that an environmental impact statement will be required.
Segmentation is the division of the environmental review of an action such that various activities or stages are addressed under SEQRA as though they were independent, unrelated activities, needing individual determinations of significance.
State Agency is any State department, agency, board, public benefit corporation, public authority or commission.
Uncoordinated Review is a process in which more than one agency is involved in the SEQRA review process and there is no lead agency. Each agency proceeds as if it was the only one involved and each agency makes its own determination of significance. An uncoordinated review may be done for unlisted actions.
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
REVIEW ACT
September 2006 900-1-02.6
12
8. SEQRA Flowchart

September 2006 900-1-02.6
EXHIBIT 1
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR STATE PROJECTS (6 NYCRR PART 502)
Page 1 of 4
The Corporation must ensure that the use of property under the jurisdiction of the Corporation and the siting, construction, administration and disposition of property under the jurisdiction of the Corporation and State-financed facilities are conducted in ways that will minimize flood hazards and losses. For projects within a flood hazard area, the Corporation must ensure that the project meets regulatory requirements by considering and documenting the following criteria. These requirements do not include projects involving ordinary maintenance and repair of existing structures or facilities. Contact Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for identification of flood hazard areas.
I. Determination of Flood Hazard Area Boundaries and Base Flood Elevations
1. Has the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) designated the flood hazard areas and/or base flood elevations for the project location on a flood hazard boundary map or flood insurance rate map or a flood insurance study? If no, these must be determined by the Corporation in cooperation with NYSDEC. Contact GIS for assistance.
September 2006 900-1-02.6
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR STATE PROJECTS (6 NYCRR PART 502) Page 2 of 4
September 2006 900-1-02.6
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR STATE PROJECTS (6 NYCRR PART 502) Page 3 of 4
B. Areas where the regulatory floodway has been designated within the flood hazard area
C. Areas where the coastal high hazard area has been designated within the flood hazard area
September 2006 900-1-02.6
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR STATE PROJECTS (6 NYCRR PART 502) Page 4 of 4
Other notes and comments:
Prepared by: Date: September 2006 900-1-02.6
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
EXHIBIT 2
Page 1 of 3
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS POTENTIALLY APPLICABLE TO PROJECTS ON CANAL
CORPORATION LAND
| Permit Description | Permit Required? | |
|---|---|---|
| Freshwater or Tidal Wetlands Permit—needed to develop or otherwise disturb wetlands subject to regulation by any federal, State, or local agency. Applications should be made to all agencies with jurisdiction over a particular wetland area. o NYSDEC o County, City, or Town o Adirondack Park Agency o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes | No No No No No |
| Protection of Waters Permit o Disturbance of the Bed or Banks of a Protected Stream or Other Watercourse—required for disturbing the bed or banks of a stream with a classification and standard of C(T) or higher (disturbance may be either temporary or permanent in nature). o Construction, Reconstruction or Repair of Dams and other Impounding Structures—required when constructing, reconstructing, repairing, or modifying dams and water impounding structures that permanently or temporarily impound water as a result of a structure placed across a watercourse or overland drainage way or which receive water from an external source such as drainage diversion or pumping of ground water. o Construction, Reconstruction or Expansion of Docking and Mooring Facilities—required for constructing, reconstructing, or repairing docks or platforms and installing moorings on, in or above navigable waters to create docking facilities, mooring areas or to facilitate other activities. | Yes Yes Yes Yes | No No No No |
September 2006 900-1-02.6
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS POTENTIALLY APPLICABLE TO PROJECTS ON CANAL
CORPORATION LAND
| Permit Description | Permit Required? | |
|---|---|---|
| o Excavation or Placement of Fill in Navigable Waters and Their Adjacent and Contiguous Wetlands—required for excavating or placing fill in navigable waters of the State, below the mean high water level, including adjacent and contiguous marshes and wetlands. o Water Quality Certifications for Projects Requiring a Federal Permit—required when placing fill or undertaking activities resulting in a discharge to waters of the United States where, for example, a permit is required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. | Yes Yes | No No |
| Rivers Act Permit—may be required when developing land near a wild, scenic, or recreational waterway. Applications must be made to any federal, state, or local agency with jurisdiction over the particular waterway segment under consideration. | Yes | No |
| Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permits – required for construction, modification, restoration and activities in an area designated as a coastal erosion hazard area. | Yes | No |
| Air Pollution Control Permits—may be required before constructing a new source of air pollution or modifying an existing source of air pollution. Based on the level of emissions and types of pollutants, additional review, permits and requirements from NYSDEC and EPA may be required. | Yes | No |
| Bulk Petroleum Storage Registration—required if applicant intends to store petroleum products (whether below ground or above ground) or dispense petroleum products in the operation of the developed site or will be removing existing registered tanks. | Yes | No |
| Chemical Bulk Storage Permit – required when hazardous substances will be stored in tanks. A spill prevention report plan is also required. | Yes | No |
| Hazardous Waste Generator Identification Number—required from EPA if applicant will generate, store or treat hazardous waste during construction or operation. | Yes | No |
September 2006 900-1-02.6
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS POTENTIALLY APPLICABLE TO PROJECTS ON CANAL
CORPORATION LAND
| Permit Description | Permit Required? | |
|---|---|---|
| Mined Land Reclamation Permit—required if the applicant will remove more than 1,000 tons of minerals from the ground in any 12 month period. | Yes | No |
| Solid Waste Management Facility Permit—required if applicant intends to store or process solid waste on the developed site. | Yes | No |
| State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit—required of any business that discharges any chemicals to the ground or surface water. Applicable during operation of the developed site as well as during construction of the site. | Yes | No |
| State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Stormwater Permit – required for construction that will affect more than one acre of land and required for operation of certain types of facilities with the potential to impact stormwater. A stormwater pollution prevention plan is also required. | Yes | No |
| Construction Permits—must be obtained from Corporation and/or other applicable agencies charged with ensuring that proposed construction is in accordance with all applicable building, fire and sanitary code requirements. | Yes | No |
| Floating Object Permit—required before placing any floating object in a navigable waterway. Issued by the agency with jurisdiction over the waterway. | Yes | No |
| U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) Permits – required for a variety of activities affecting navigable waters including wetlands, dams, dikes, structures, dredging. Some permits are filed through a joint NYSDEC/USCOE application. | Yes | No |
| Other Permits Required: | Yes | No |
Prepared by: Date:
September 2006 900-1-02.6
EXHIBIT 3
SEQRA TYPE I ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.4)
Page 1 of 3
(iii) in a city, town or village having a population of less than 150,000, 250 units to be connected (at the commencement of habitation) to existing community or public water and sewerage systems including sewage treatment works;
September 2006 900-1-02.6
SEQRA TYPE I ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.4)
Page 2 of 3
September 2006 900-1-02.6
SEQRA TYPE I ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.4)
Page 3 of 3
September 2006 900-1-02.6
EXHIBIT 4
SEQRA TYPE II ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.5)
Page 1 of 4
The following actions are not subject to review under SEQRA:
September 2006 900-1-02.6
SEQRA TYPE II ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.5)
Page 2 of 4
September 2006 900-1-02.6
SEQRA TYPE II ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.5) Page 3 of 4
September 2006 900-1-02.6
SEQRA TYPE II ACTIONS (6 NYCRR §617.5) Page 4 of 4
September 2006 900-1-02.6
27
EXHIBIT 5 DOCUMENTATION OF PROJECTS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE FURTHER SEQRA REVIEW
This form must be completed if the real property transaction under review does not require further SEQRA review pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.5 or is identified in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) prepared for the Canal Recreationway Plan (CRP).
It has been determined that this action is exempt from SEQRA review because:
____ Identified impacts (if any) of the action have been adequately addressed in the GEIS conducted with relation to the CRP, and the action now contemplated is the same scope of action addressed in the GEIS. The proposed action is:
-[or]-
____ The proposed action is a SEQRA Type II action that will not require further environmental review. List appropriate number from Exhibit 4 in which the proposed action falls under and provide any additional explanation if needed:
Print Name of Reviewing Engineer: __________________________
Signature of Reviewing Engineer: ____________________________ Date: __________
September 2006 900-1-02.6
EXHIBIT 6
DETERMINING ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE UNDER SEQRA (6 NYCRR §617.7)
Page 1 of 3
Determining significance
(1) To determine whether a proposed Type I or unlisted action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the impacts that may be reasonably expected to result from the proposed action must be compared against the criteria in this subdivision. The following list is illustrative, not exhaustive. These criteria are considered indicators of significant adverse impacts on the environment: September 2006 900-1-02.6
DETERMINING ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE UNDER SEQRA (6 NYCRR §617.7) Page 2 of 3
(iii) the impairment of the environmental characteristics of a critical environmental area as designated pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.14(g);
(vii) the creation of a hazard to human health;
(viii) a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses;
September 2006 900-1-02.6
DETERMINING ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE UNDER SEQRA (6 NYCRR §617.7) Page 3 of 3
(xi) changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment; or
(xii) two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria in this subdivision.
(iii) its duration;
(vii) the number of people affected.